기업조회

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

논문 기본정보

Comparison of Efficacy of Propofol When Used with or without Remifentanil during Conscious Sedation with a Target-Controlled Infuser for Impacted Teeth Extraction

논문 개요

기관명, 저널명, ISSN, ISBN 으로 구성된 논문 개요 표입니다.
기관명 NDSL
저널명 대한치과마취과학회지 = Journal of the Korean Dental Society of Anesthesiology
ISSN 1598-4044,2383-7039
ISBN

논문저자 및 소속기관 정보

저자, 소속기관, 출판인, 간행물 번호, 발행연도, 초록, 원문UR, 첨부파일 순으로 구성된 논문저자 및 소속기관 정보표입니다
저자(한글) Sung, Juhan,Kim, Hyun-Jeong,Choi, Yoon Ji,Lee, Soo Eon,Seo, Kwang-Suk
저자(영문)
소속기관
소속기관(영문)
출판인
간행물 번호
발행연도 2014-01-01
초록 Background: Clinical use of propofol along with remifentanil for intravenous sedation is increasing in these days, but there are not enough researches to evaluate proper target concentration when these drugs are infused by using target controlled infusion (TCI) pump in dental treatment cases. In this study, we compared efficacy of TCI conscious sedation and target concentration of propofol when it used with or without remifentanil during conscious sedation with the help of a TCI for the surgical extraction of impacted teeth. Methods: After IRB approval, all the charts of patients who had undergone surgical extraction of impacted teeth under propofol TCI sedation for 6 months were selected and reviewed for this study. After reviewal of charts, we could divide patients in two groups. In one group (group 1), only propofol was selected for sedation and initial effect site concentration of propofol was $1{ mu}g/ml$ (n = 33), and in another group (group 2), both propofol and remifentanil was infused and initial effect site concentration of each drug was $0.6{ mu}g/ml$ and 1 ng/ml respectively (n = 25). For each group, average propofol target concentration was measured. In addition, we compared heart rate, respiratory rate, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure as well as oxygen saturation. Besides, BIS, sedation scores (OAAS/S), and subjective satisfaction scores were compared. Results: Between group 1 and 2, there were no significant differences in demographics (age, weight and height), and total sedation time. However, total infused dose and the effect site target concentration of propofol was $163.8{ pm}74.5mg$ and $1.13{ pm}0.21{ mu}g/ml$ in group 1, and $104.3{ pm}46.5mg$ and $0.72{ pm}0.26{ mu}g/ml$ in the group 2 with $1.02{ pm}0.21ng/l$ of the effect site target concentration of remifentanil, respectively. During sedation, there were no differences between overall vital sign, BIS and OAAS/S in 2 groups (P gt; 0.05). However, we figured out patients in group 2 had decreased pain sensation during sedation. Conclusions: Co-administration of propofol along with remifentanil via a TCI for the surgical extraction of impacted teeth may be safe and effective compared to propofol only administration.
원문URL http://click.ndsl.kr/servlet/OpenAPIDetailView?keyValue=03553784&target=NART&cn=JAKO201403760397392
첨부파일

추가정보

과학기술표준분류, ICT 기술분류,DDC 분류,주제어 (키워드) 순으로 구성된 추가정보표입니다
과학기술표준분류
ICT 기술분류
DDC 분류
주제어 (키워드) Propofol,Remifentanil,Sedation,Target concentration,Target controlled infusion,Tooth extraction