기업조회

본문 바로가기 주메뉴 바로가기

논문 기본정보

수정된 크로스-바디 스트레칭이 오목위팔관절의 관절가동범위에 미치는 영향

논문 개요

기관명, 저널명, ISSN, ISBN 으로 구성된 논문 개요 표입니다.
기관명 NDSL
저널명 대한물리의학회지 = Journal of the Korean Society of Physical Medicine
ISSN 1975-311x,
ISBN

논문저자 및 소속기관 정보

저자, 소속기관, 출판인, 간행물 번호, 발행연도, 초록, 원문UR, 첨부파일 순으로 구성된 논문저자 및 소속기관 정보표입니다
저자(한글) 고은경,정도영
저자(영문)
소속기관
소속기관(영문)
출판인
간행물 번호
발행연도 2015-01-01
초록 PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of cross-body stretching (CBS) and modified cross-body stretching (MCBS) on the range of motion (ROM) of glenohumeral joint (GHJ) in healthy subjects. METHODS: Thirty subjects were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: CBS group without stabilization of scapula (n=15) and MCBS group with stabilization of scapula (n=15). We measured horizontal adduction and internal rotation ROM of GHJ in pre- and post-intervention. The data were analyzed using the analyses of covariate (ANCOVA) and least significant difference (LSD) post hoc tests (p=.05). RESULTS: In the post-intervention, the MCBS group had a significantly greater increase in horizontal adduction ROM (mean ${ pm}$ SD, $11.46^{ circ}{ pm}0.83^{ circ}$ ) compared to the CBS group ( $7.81^{ circ}{ pm}0.83^{ circ}$ ) (p=.007) and a greater increase in internal rotation ROM ( $62.27^{ circ}{ pm}0.74^{ circ}$ ) compared to the CBS group ( $59.20^{ circ}{ pm}0.74^{ circ}$ ) (p=.004). CONCLUSION: A single session application of an MCBS provides immediate more improvements in both horizontal adduction and internal rotation ROM than CBS. These results suggest that application of MCBS with stabilization of scapula may be a more useful to gain ROM of GHJ than CBS without stabilization of scapula.
원문URL http://click.ndsl.kr/servlet/OpenAPIDetailView?keyValue=03553784&target=NART&cn=JAKO201501256374402
첨부파일

추가정보

과학기술표준분류, ICT 기술분류,DDC 분류,주제어 (키워드) 순으로 구성된 추가정보표입니다
과학기술표준분류
ICT 기술분류
DDC 분류
주제어 (키워드) Cross-body stretch,Posterior shoulder tightness,Shoulder impingement